Section 5: Place Shaping Policies Sandhurst
This response report contains comments received on Section 5: Place Shaping Policies – Sandhurst section.
Contents
Policy STR/SA 1: The Strategy for Sandhurst Parish
Comment No. | Name/Organisation | Response |
---|---|---|
DLP_8306 | NHS West Clinical Commissioning Group | General Observation The CCG notes that it is expected that contributions will be required towards health/medical facilities to mitigate the impact of the development. These will be requested, as necessary, in line with CCG Policy which is currently for developments of over 20 houses or more; noting that the allocations currently detailed are for less than 20 houses. |
DLP_600 | Sport England | Policy STR/SA 1 Sport England supports bullet point h the improvements to the football pitch as it is in line with adopted Playing Pitch Strategy. |
DLP_3358 | Kent County Council (Growth, Environment and Transport) | Highways and Transportation The Local Highway Authority conditionally supports this policy. The following changes are requested: The specific reference to PRoW in paragraph 4 is supported. It is requested that PRoW enhancements are included in the list of expected contributions, to mitigate the impact of future development. |
DLP_5741 | Sandhurst Parish Council | please find attached a copy of the plan for Sandhurst playing fields which highlights the area purchased by the Parish Council which could be used potentially as the site for a new village hall – please see below. Please also see our comments below which we believe should be included in the Local Plan: View of the possible long term strategy of the Sandhurst Parish Council for developments and improvements |
DLP_4153 | Tunbridge Wells District Committee Campaign to Protect Rural England | Object We are concerned that the part of this policy referring to developments larger than 100 residential units could encourage applications for major developments which are thoroughly unsuitable in the AONB. Arguably, for sustainability, any development of more than 20 dwellings in villages and the rural area ought at least to provide some employment possibilities, for example through live/work units. |
DLP_4566 | Historic England | Policy STR/SA 1: The Strategy for Sandhurst Parish et seq. - as with the foregoing comments, we would expect the allocation of sites following on from this Strategy policy to be subject to appropriately robust and detailed heritage impact assessment prior to the allocations being adopted. |
DLP_5747 | Kent Design Studio for Mrs C Hinves | Please see attached a site we require consideration under the current call for sites process attached to this email. I can confirm the address of the site is; Sharps Hill Farm, [TWBC: see site location plan]. |
Policy AL/SA 1: Land on the south side of Sayville, Rye Road and west of Marsh Quarter Lane
Comment No. | Name/Organisation | Object/support/support with conditions/general observation | Response |
---|---|---|---|
DLP_3574 | Barton Willmore for Clarendon Homes | Support with conditions | TWBC: no supporting documents were submitted with this representation. Clarendon Homes, as promoters to this site, broadly supports this policy as including the objective of securing approximately 10 – 15 dwellings at the site. Clarendon does however make the following representations concerning the site. 1. Site Area Clarendon has promoted the site (inc. submission to the Call for Sites) on the basis of a larger site area encompassing land to the south of the allocation area (SHELAA reference – 149). The allocation land therefore only concerns the northern part of the wider site. Whilst supporting the allocation of this parcel, Clarendon fails to see why the southern parcel has been omitted from the allocation. Within the Draft Local Plan evidence base, only the Sustainability Appraisal makes reference to the division of the site, yet this is not clear. Table 47 (page 99) within the SA provides an assessment of the whole site (as per the map on the previous page - 98) as against a number of sustainability indicators and thus confirming the acceptability of the whole site in sustainability terms. Of particular note, “Heritage” and “Landscape” indicators are scored as “Slightly Negative” and “Neutral/Slightly Negative” respectively. Conversely, at Appendix S (page 215), the whole site receives a worse SA scoring for “Heritage” and “Landscape” being “Slightly Negative/Negative” and “Negative” respectively. Clarendon has undertaken background surveys for the site and in particular does not agree with the “Heritage” scoring in the latter SA (Appendix S) as above for the whole of the site. There are limited heritage implications for the southern part of the site (as well as the northern element). We would therefore recommend that the “Heritage” scoring for the entire Clarendon land is rated as “Neutral”. In landscape terms, whilst the site is in the AONB (which washes over all of Sandhurst), Clarendon considers that appropriate mitigation can be secured towards the southern boundary of the whole site (with regard to the relationship/views to the wider AONB to the south). This can be secured through a package of landscape measures including the provision of meadow land/open space/SuDS/landscape planting along the Clarendon submitted southern boundary. In “Landscape” terms, we therefore consider a “Neutral/Slightly Negative” scoring to be appropriate. Notwithstanding the above comments, a negative grading in terms of landscape does not necessarily preclude a site (parcel thereof) from development. This is evident at Hawkhurst Golf Club, which receives a “Negative/Very Negative” scoring in the SA in landscape terms – a worse grading than the wider (southern) Clarendon site. Clarendon considers that the site, including the southern parcel, is able to accommodate a greater level of development than that allocated in the Draft Local Plan. In this regard, the National Planning Policy Framework 2019 (Section 11 – Making Effective Use of Land) seeks for development proposals to make optimal use of land and achieve appropriate densities. In this regard, Clarendon considers that the whole site is capable of accommodating up to c. 30 dwellings whilst respecting inter-alia, heritage assets and landscape character. This level of development would make a more meaningful contribution to the Council’s housing supply (inc. affordable housing) and mix. The Draft Local Plan seeks to make provision for a total supply of 14,776 units up to 2035/36. As against the Government’s current requirement during the same period (13,560 units) this amounts to a 9% uplift on the housing need. The total identified supply is however based on an average figure whereby sites and settlements are identified to deliver ranges/parameters of development. For example, Hawkhurst is identified for development of 643 – 693 dwellings during the Plan period. Within this quantum, Hawkhurst Golf Club (AL/HA 1) is allocated for c. 400 – 450 units and thereby an average of 425 units for this site is used in the housing supply for the Local Plan. We do not dispute this approach however it may be the case that the Local Plan does not achieve the full anticipated levels of growth. Increasing the quantum of development on this site (and potentially others) would enable the Council to achieve a higher buffer and thus provide for more flexibility in the market for new homes. We would therefore recommend that the policy/allocation is amended to “providing approximately 30 dwellings” and also to encompass the southern parcel of the whole Clarendon site. The policy refers to the following off-site works: - Provision of a new crossing on Rye Road (Criterion 2); and Clarendon does not necessarily object to the principle of these provisions, however such provisions should be made by virtue of “proportionate contributions” towards S278 highways works as undertaken by the Highway Authority. It is thereby recommended that the criteria be amended as follows: - “Proportionate contributions towards” the provision of a new crossing on Rye Road (Criterion 2); and The above contributions to be made from the site must be (as per NPPF – para 56): - Necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms; 4. Other Planning ObligationsCriterion 8 refers to “Improvements to existing” allotments, amenity/natural green space, parks and recreation grounds, and child and local play space. This is supported by Clarendon. Conversely Policy STR/SA 1 – Strategy for Sandhurst (Criterion 5) refers to “Provision of” allotments, amenity/natural green space, parks and recreation grounds, children’s play space and youth play space. Policy STR/SA 1 assumes the provision of new facilities, whereas AL/SA 1 correctly relates to improvements to existing facilities. It is therefore recommended that STR/SA 1 is amended for consistency. The policy (AL/SA 1) also refers to contributions towards: - Public realm at the centre of Sandhurst; Clarendon does not necessarily object to the principle of these provisions, however the contributions to be made from the site must be (as per NPPF – para 56): - Necessary to make the development acceptable in planning terms; |
DLP_3359 | Kent County Council (Growth, Environment and Transport) | Support with conditions | Highways and TransportationThe Local Highway Authority conditionally supports this policy. The following changes are requested: Public Rights of Way and Access Service The provision of pedestrian links between the site and Public Footpath WC295 are supported. It is requested that contributions will also be made towards off-site improvements along this PRoW, to mitigate the impact of the development. Heritage ConservationScale 4 - Low level archaeology anticipated which could be dealt with through suitable conditions on a planning approval. |
Policy AL/SA 2: Land adjacent to Old Orchard and Stream Pit Lane
Comment No. | Name/Organisation | Object/support/support with conditions/general observation | Response |
---|---|---|---|
DLP_2119 | Terry Everest | Object | Object Its an orchard or was an orchard and should be protected or replanted as such. |
DLP_3360 | Kent County Council (Growth, Environment and Transport) | Support with conditions | Highways and Transportation The Local Highway Authority conditionally supports this policy. The following changes are requested: Heritage Conservation Scale 4 - Low level archaeology anticipated which could be dealt with through suitable conditions on a planning approval. |